Human Rights.
Operational software has consequences. We evaluate every engagement against a human-rights filter at intake and we walk away from work we cannot deploy responsibly.
Position
Seifert Dynamics supports the principles in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We do not engage with operations whose primary purpose is the suppression of those rights.
Engagement Filter
Every engagement is reviewed at intake against an internal use-of-capability filter. Programs intended for mass surveillance of civilian populations, suppression of legal political expression, or targeting based on protected characteristics are not eligible.
Defense, intelligence, and law-enforcement engagements are reviewed on a per-program basis against the same filter and against applicable export-control and end-use regulations. We have walked away from work that did not pass the filter.
Operator Obligations
Atlas and Argus include access-control, role-based-access, and audit features that support — but do not replace — operator obligations to use the platform lawfully and proportionately. Deployment agreements include corresponding representations and warranties.
We retain the right to terminate a deployment for documented misuse, subject to the deployment agreement's wind-down terms.
Salient Risks
Our salient human-rights risks relate to: surveillance scope creep within a customer's deployment; data-sharing demands by law enforcement; and dual-use of replay/audit capabilities. Each is addressed by a combination of platform safeguards (tenant isolation, RBAC, audit chain) and contractual commitments.
Reporting
Concerns about a specific deployment should be raised to that operator first. General concerns to Seifert Dynamics: ethics@seifertdynamics.com. We do not retaliate against good-faith reports.
Last updated: 2026.